A Reaction to the Banking Crisis: Reinforce international prudential and resolution rules

This should be a wake up call. Financial authorities must properly implement and reinforce international prudential and resolution...

The last stretch: reaping the benefits of the sustainable finance framework

In 2018, as part of the European Green Deal, the European Commission presented an EU action plan on sustainable...

Basel approach not sufficient to address climate-related risks

How novel are the Principles? The Principles are the first formal guidance on climate-related financial risks from the...

The One-for-One Rule: A way for COP26 ambitions to manifest in financial regulation

With the transition to net zero, fossil fuel assets of banks and insurers will rapidly diminish in value...

“Bank lobby has been successful at fighting reform”

Christian Chavagneux: You identify “leverage” as the key challenge of banking reform. Why? Robert Jenkins : We are...

Basel III finalisation comes undone: A proposal that lets down citizens and backtracks on global agreements

Overview The global regulatory framework agreed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in December 2017 (Basel III),...

Unprepared, the financial system will triple people’s bills for climate change

The first bill: the physical impacts of fossil finance Despite the Paris Agreement, world governments and the financial...

#NoMoreCrises: Unkept Promises of Reform

The true cost of the 2008 crisis As authorities only just prevented a 2023 repeat of the 2008...

The stage is being set for another financial crisis

2008: A Crisis We Should Have Learned From In 2008, the world experienced the worst financial crisis since...

Help us voice society’s concerns to avoid a further deregulation of the banking sector

This summer the European Commission launched a new consultation on the“possible impact of the CRR and CRD IV on bank...

Four fixes to make shadow banking a little bit safer

In its ongoing bid to regulate shadow banking, the Financial Stability Board (FSB) has turned to the intriguing...

So-called “Basel IV” would help restore trust in the health of the European banking sector

There is compelling evidence that the use of internal models for determining regulatory capital has led to rampant...

Capital requirements: a “silver bullet” against the looming climate-induced financial crises

The tremendous macro-economic consequences of the looming climate crisis are forcing financial supervisors to acknowledge that regulatory action...

Banks do best for society when they have more capital, not less

On 24 January, EU policymakers demonstrated that when it comes to financial stability, memory is short. Members of...

BCBS at last leveling the playing field #Playitfair

Big banks (Too-Big-to-Fail) are allowed to use their own models to determine their regulatory capital = the minimum amount...

Climate risks and financial stability: the snowballing cost of procrastination

After years of warnings on the tremendous macro-economic consequences of the unfolding climate crisis, financial supervisors are finally...

4 reasons why banks and insurers can’t withstand the climate crisis without extra loss-absorption capacity

Financial supervisors are increasingly concerned about the links between climate change and financial stability. They are right –...

Fixing Basel III doesn’t make it Basel IV #PlayItFair

Big banks (Too-Big-to-Fail) are allowed to use their own models to determine their regulatory capital = the minimum amount...

Fossil fuel lending is a financial stability issue

N.b.: This is an extract of an article by Greg Ford that was first published on 10 August...

8 lobby myths about higher capital requirements for fossil banking

Banks are crucial to our economy – they manage peoples’ deposits and savings, with them also allocating money...

Help us voice society’s concerns to avoid a further deregulation of the banking sector

This summer the European Commission launched a new consultation on the“possible impact of the CRR and CRD IV on bank financing of the economy”, which raises a number of concerns. Indeed, the questions in the consultation document seem to focus too much on the alleged constraints on banks’ ability to lend and the implementation costs, rather than on the benefits of the regulation for the economy and for society at large. Given the usual imbalance in the responses (in favour of the financial industry), the compilation of responses to the consultation could result in a perception that the cost of implementing some provisions of the CRD package (a private cost) outweighs the cost of not implementing them (a social cost). The outcome of the consultation could therefore put pressure on policy makers to decrease standards rather than deliver a (much-needed) improvement, which would be a poor outcome from a public interest perspective.

What can I do?

All organisations and citizens are able to contribute to this consultation. The deadline is 7 October. Here is how to do it:

  • The online questionnaire of the consultation and related documents and information are available on the European Commission’s website here: https://ec.europa.eu/eusurvey/runner/long-term-finance-2015?surveylanguage=en
  • Questions include multiple choice and free text boxes. Choose which questions you want to answer (we suggest focussing on questions 2, 4, 5, 9, 13, 14, 15) and fill-in the online questionnaire: the first part is to provide key information about you or your organisation; the second part (“your opinion”) is where you can make your points.
  • If you wish, you can use the answers suggested by Finance Watch in the second page of this document (click here to download it) (2)

Responses will be published on the Commission’s website and analysed once the consultation is closed.  Finance Watch plans to comment on the outcome of the consultation. To follow our work, subscribe to our newsletter here: http://www.finance-watch.org/friends-newsletter

Notes:

(1) To know more, see Finance Watch’s assessment of the EU regulation on the capital of banks here : http://www.finance-watch.org/our-work/dossiers?fid=94

(2) For background on some of the issues raised, see our paper “Basel 3 in 5 Questions” http://www.finance-watch.org/ifile/Publications/Reports/Basel-3-in-5-questions.pdf . For a debunk of arguments commonly used against higher capital, see http://bankersnewclothes.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Parade-continues-October.pdf


Source: https://www.finance-watch.org/blog/help-us-voice-societys-concerns-to-avoid-a-further-deregulation-of-the-banking-sector/

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
guest